|
Fell pony
breed information www.FellponyInfo.com (Home) (previously Fellpony.com)
|
|
|
Where Do We Go from Here? By Sue Millard - Cumbria, England
(adapted from a talk given at “British Rare Breeds on Parade”
Kentucky Horse Park, USA – June 2003)" - Published in the Fell
Pony Journal and reprinted by permission of the editor and author
American
enthusiasts have imported British horse and pony breeds for many years, even
centuries…. Welsh, Dartmoors, Fells, Suffolks, the Cleveland Bay.
Some have been bred together as a population, and some have vanished into
the wider equine universe leaving barely a mark.
This article will concentrate on those breeds that have a presence in
America now, in particular, those that the American Livestock Breeds Conservancy
(ALBC) and the Equus Survival Trust call rare
or endangered.
* there are fewer than 1,000 annual North American registrations *
and fewer than 5,000 individuals globally. For
the British Rare Breed Survival Trust (RBST) and the Equus Survival Trust, the
criterion for rarity or endangered is “fewer than 500 breeding females”. · are physically alike and distinct from others of the same species, · and when you breed them together, they predictably reproduce the type. I’m
going to refer mainly to ponies although of course many of my comments will
apply equally to horse breeds, purely because I am more versed in the pony
breeds. Let me also say that I am
going to speak mainly as an interested onlooker. I’m not “an expert”.
I’m an informed enthusiast and I’m lucky enough to live amongst Fell ponies
in Northern England and be allowed to judge them. Cause and effect
As
circumstances, environments and fashions change, animal breeds change too.
Change is the road ahead. Those who don’t adapt, die out. If humans change the original purpose of a native pony, the basic “tough”
but invisible qualities of the breed can be lost. If the purpose is changed to
suit whims of the market about the “looks” of the breed, those tough
invisible qualities WILL be lost.
Nature gave native
ponies hair direction and whorls to direct water away from more delicate areas
of the body: * tail set so as to keep the “naughty” bits dry; * small ears that don’t lose heat, because they’re buried in mane; * large nasal structures to warm cold air before it gets into the main body cavity; * projecting above-the-eye “protection” from rain; * general insulating hairiness; * hard, even teeth to grind coarse food, and a broad jaw to house them; * a big belly to store that coarse food while it’s being digested Where we are now is that there are British native breeds here in America. Some have more or fewer individuals. The native breeds considered rare by ALBC standards are all at a greater risk of being changed because their populations are small. Remember: fewer than 1,000 annual North American registrations and fewer than 5,000 individuals globally. Where do we
want to get to? What
do we want our horse and pony breeds to become as we trot along the road to the
future? ·
the breed type ·
excellence of
conformation ·
excellence at doing the
work What do these requirements mean?If
we look at the breed type – the motherland’s breed standards usually just
describe what is a visibly “good average type” for that breed. What makes a
Fell look like a Fell and not like a Dales or a Dartmoor? What makes a Shire
look different from a Clydesdale or a Suffolk? That’s breed type. If
we look at excellence of conformation
– the show ring requires visible “standards of excellence” on top of that
breed type.
What are the qualities we desire in the population?* How do we choose breeding stock for the next generation? * What’s the purpose of our breeding? * Who should set the standards? A
responsible breeder will have a plan. This is one of your signposts along the
road. “If you don’t know where you
want to go, any road will take you there.” I’m
assuming in this basic question that you have a mare. Maybe you have more than
one mare. You have invested cash and time in this member of your chosen breed
and you enjoy owning her. You’re committed.
Why do you want to breed a foal from her? Of course there are many
answers. No answer is intrinsically right or wrong. You just need to be clear
which answer is yours and what consequences arise from the choices you make. A foal for your own useYou
may want: A foal just for your own use — maybe you have a sport or leisure
purpose for the offspring. You may just breed for the interest of breeding
something, anything — from your mare — you need not breed pure or register
it, and possibly you may never breed another. After all, horses live long. A foal to perpetuate a good bloodlineYou
may want: A foal to perpetuate a good bloodline. So what is good about that
bloodline? Performance, beauty, rarity, temperament, hardiness, vigour? You need
to know what is good in order to choose a stallion that will match that quality
and not dilute it. Equally, you need to avoid carrying on or bringing in poor
qualities that might degrade future generations. A foal to sell, to recoup expensesYou
may want: a foal to sell, to get back your initial outlay, or just to make a
profit. This is a big problem when breeds have been imported to a new country.
Expense gives any imported animal a “cost” value that may be out of
proportion to its breed value. It’s
tempting to breed from an imported animal in order to cover your initial outlay.
It’s very tempting indeed to use the nearest stallion of that breed or the one
that is best known or advertised. Of course, you can breed any number of foals
that will sell on “purebred” status alone. That doesn’t guarantee a good
foal with value to the breed. Ask yourself, “Do I want to sell just the visible,
or propagate the invisible qualities
of my breed as well?” Dangers of fast expansion of ownership of a breedUltimately, fast “ownership expansion” will produce a “bubble” that bursts. Yes, the breeders who sell foals will make money for the first few years while prices rise. They perceive somethingWe saw this bubble happen in
America with Arabian horses in the 1980s. Their value escalated from an average
of three thousand dollars to fifteen thousand dollars to, in some cases, a
quarter of a million. It ruined the quality of the Arabian breed while it
lasted because too many people weren't breeders - just businessmen. When the
bottom dropped out the horses went overnight from being worth a quarter of a
million on mortality insurance policies back to twenty thousand or less.
Who survived it? The breeders who
ignored the fashion and continued with their long range plans.
Their horses still sold, albeit for smaller sums throughout, the
marketing remained much the same and their quality never bore the marks of
“get rich quick at any price”.
If
you keep your progeny till they are four or five and sell them as broken stock,
you can ask higher prices, but by then, you only have room to keep one or two
mares because of all their progeny. Native ponies are cheap to feed, but it will
take some very good sales of very well trained ponies to cover five years’
costs. If that’s how you work, then I salute you. You are the salt of the earth. You know that the market really wants a made, sound, fit, ready-to-ride horse or pony; not a tender weanling or a green broke three year old. You’re ready to stand some initial figures in the red to get to the point where you have that product ready to sell. Selling
every foal makes problems for the owners. For
a start there will be wastage among the animals that are sold as youngsters. It
is skilled work rearing youngstock to adulthood without spoiling their tempers.
A spoilt pony is a menace, no matter how expensive it was to buy. It
is also hugely tempting to start serious work with a young pony that looks
mature compared to other breeds — say Thoroughbreds. Part of this is their
body type, less leggy and much broader. Natives in fact mature slowly. They are
not usefully mature until they are over five and some not until they are seven
or even older. If you train them as though they are mature you will of course
ruin their legs and backs. They will live and work honestly to a great age if
they are given time, but not everyone has the patience or money to give them
that time. The guy who keeps many mares and sells every foal may be ahead in the
money stakes, but he’s selling hopes and dreams.
How can he promise what you’ll have when it’s grown if he’s never
kept any himself? Selling every foal makes problems for the breed Selling
every foal you produce disperses stock into the general population without any
strategy; and as a practice it certainly can’t claim to provide support for a
breed. It’s exploitation, not conservation. It isn’t until you choose to
keep some of your best foals for future breeding that you climb up that
important step from being a producer, who just produces any foal, with any
bloodlines, so long as it is healthy enough to sell. So, we will assume that you are on the side of the angels. You love your breed, you don’t mind the initial outlay and the delay in taking your profit. You want: A foal to represent a breed and to help preserve it What are the qualities of your breed that are important? How do you know what they are when you live so far away that there is a major ocean and half a continent between you and its natural home? I’m
going to be briefly cynical here. Those who claim to be preserving a rare breed
may not in fact be doing so. I am using the word Preserve rather than Conserve
advisedly. Be forewarned of the dangers of the mere “preservation” of a
breed. They may become objects whose
purpose and inner integrity has been eroded. Don’t preserve them so well them
that they become museum pieces instead of useful partners. The
marketplace in 50 years time? Where
will our exported British Native ponies be in the marketplace in fifty years’
time? Will
they still have any purpose, any integrity as individual breeds? What will their
cash value be fifty years down the line? I wonder… I worry about the payment
of lip service to the idea of “preserving” of a rare breed of horses or
ponies. For instance, David Attenborough observed the
making of Stone Age type axes in New Guinea in the mid 20th Century,
which looked good but were purely ornamental and not fit for any use. I worry
that a “preserved” breed with no working purpose may become equally useless.
Financial
considerations
A breeder may be strongly influenced by financial considerations in what he breeds and how he presents it. For instance, if Fell ponies were to sell better with their feather clipped off, and if the lighter sorts sold better than more drafty sorts, then in that area, for that market, the Fell breed becomes a lighter sport pony with less feather. The man who sticks with breeding the more true-to-type mountain pony may make very few sales.
Breeding
for fashion
Breeding
to satisfy a whimsical commercial market is very likely to lose breed type and
integrity. It will dilute those invisible native qualities such as toughness,
vigour, hardiness and sound temper. Sometimes fashion marketing goes as far as
promoting a breed under false pretences, such as claiming links to other popular
but unrelated breeds. Then the integrity of the breed is compromised – to say
nothing of Joe Public’s perceptions about the commercial integrity of its
breeders. If
a breed finds it doesn’t have a practical working purpose any more, then
should we perhaps impose strict guidelines on its production? Or should we
invent a new working purpose for it? If we don’t do something it will very
likely change for the worse, or even die out. A
foal to improve the breed. Well,
the final scenario I want to put to you is that you may want: A foal to improve
your breed. That’s no mean requirement. It’s far tougher than breeding a
foal to conserve the breed. You
still need to know the breed’s qualities thoroughly or you can’t know what
needs improvement. Only then can you know what could be improved for the sake of
the breed and more importantly what should be left exactly as it is.
You have to keep in your mind’s eye the visible breed type of its
motherland and not be deflected by the demands of the market. But
don’t lose sight of the goal – that all of them should be capable of doing
the job they are bred for and of living naturally and hardily without the need
for constant human interference. Those invisible qualities need to be allowed to
assert themselves in your stock. That may involve allowing weaknesses to reveal
themselves, and sometimes it may mean not breeding from animals that have them.
That’s a very “tough” way to love your breed. This
kind of stewardship programme may also only bring a modest financial reward –
but it brings with it a longer-term bonus of immense satisfaction. It’s a huge
challenge! Can you do it? Can you keep all those inner qualities as well as the
outer, visible ones? How do we choose
our road for survival in the marketplace? * closed stud book? * performance testing? * a collection of first prizes at shows? 1.
A closed stud book is limited
to animals whose pedigrees we can trace in the mother stud book. We breed from
that stock and not from any other. 2.
If we go down the road of Performance testing — then the only animals that may
be licensed to breed are pedigreed stock whose minds and bodies can be shown as
fit for the tasks we consider suitable and necessary. But with a small group of
breeding individuals, can we be that strict?
And
anyway, is the gathering of performance points a good guide to the invisible
hardiness and survival qualities of a breed?
And what about the ribbons and prizes themselves?
Was it a major show?
Was the class full or did the 1st prize go to a pony with only
one challenger? Was the show full of
quality or mediocre? What each
ribbon means must be qualified against such things or a string of wins becomes
dangerously distorted. There
are always some animals whose bloodlines we ought to preserve simply from the
standpoint of genetic diversity. There’s also that indefinable quality,
toughness – it’s often unrelated to speed, jumping ability, trotting action,
or whatever. It’s a determination to survive.
By contrast, breeding for any unique goal such as speed or colour or hair
or any other visible cosmetic quality can do great harm to the majority of a
breed.
The duty of the judge
If
breeding stock is selected ONLY on show points, then over several generations,
the stock can change either inwardly or outwardly. Some breeds have certainly
done so. For example, the Arabian – at least in British circles in the 70s and 80s. Show bred animals were only ever shown in halter classes. They gained in value by winning classes, they were bred, and their offspring were again shown in halter classes. By the third and fourth generations there were serious temperamental defects in some lines, but they were not displayed until a 3rd or 4th generation horse was bought to be trained for riding and put into a truly working environment. At that point accidents happened. Serious riders dismissed the Arabian breed for nearly ten years as flighty and weedy. In defence of the judges, it wasn’t their fault that these animals were not tested in real work. Show results can have different valuesCan
you grade show results? Is the winner of a first prize at the local Little
Puddleworth (East) of equal value with a first prize winner at the prestigious
Royal Agricultural? So
what is the role of the show judge in preserving breed characteristics? I
believe that judges must be a target for education – their need to know and
keep learning is at least equal to that of breeders. Judges
need to know the breed standard of the mother stud book, and they need to be
strong enough to make decisions in the ring that reflect whether the exhibits
are representative of that standard. If your judges don’t hold the breed to
the standard, your American version of it is very likely to change from the
breed in its homeland. It’s hard to uphold a standard if the judging
fraternity doesn’t know what the standard should be and doesn’t reward it
when it sees it. Breeding
for outward appearance can breed “in” unseen problems, often of unstable
temper, or lack of toughness. If you introduce rules to breed out white
markings, or to breed out every colour but the one that is preferred, the gene
pool narrows and you reduce the breeder’s options. The
first job of a native horse or pony judge is to pick the animal that is true to
its type in its home area:
* that can live as the breed does under normal circumstances; * that is built right to work well and stay sound; * that has the invisible, inner qualities that are vital as well as the outer ones that are less so; * hair type; * height; Only
AFTER that can a judge apply other criteria such as color, quantity of feather,
mane length, or white markings. Judging Globally distributed populationsSo,
we have breed populations that are spread thinly over a huge continent. Judges
from breed societies overseas are not going to be as frequently invited to judge
as more local judges. That’s purely on the grounds of cost and accessibility.
There’s going to be a natural tendency for show results to reflect the types
that the local area finds appealing. If your local area is educated on
Saddlebreds or Thoroughbreds, the type of British native may well be chosen,
bred and produced to look similar to those. Unconscious choicesThis is not to say that changes to a breed will always be the result of conscious decisions. I don’t suppose any breeder, or any judge of any British breed, really intends to change the breed when he or she starts out down the road of running a stud or of being a judge. But we do tend to like what we know. The breeder or the judge always knows his local breeds better than the “foreign” one. It’s not likely that he will naturally prefer ponies that are true to the breed type in its mother country – he is more likely to choose ponies that look like the animals he knows best.It
will take a great deal of interest, conscious training and “immersion in breed
type” to overcome such inadvertent bias. Everyone naturally thinks their own
ponies are the best! And especially their own home bred ponies! ·
The breeders in the home
country who have the experience must share it with the newcomers. ·
The newcomers must adopt
the beliefs and standards of the original breeders. That doesn’t mean they
can’t tactfully point out possible new avenues that the breed might explore! ·
Judges must be trained in
the standards of the breed and keep to them ·
And there needs to be a
workable, co-operative breeding programme or it is all being left to chance and
the breed may well die out. How do we avoid dead ends?
Yes,
there are signposts that lead to dead ends. Possible dead ends can fall under
“Neglect of paperwork” – such as not registering a foal within given
deadlines. Like the Fell ponies that E P Taylor imported into Canada in the
1950s. If there are any progeny in North America whose sire or grandsire was
Johnny Walker, they are unregistered with the Fell Pony Society and hence are
unavailable for breeding with others that ARE registered. So, if you didn’t
fill in the right forms at the right time…. remember that a purebred foal from
a closed herd book, which for any reason doesn’t have breed papers, will not
be able to contribute to the maintenance of its breed. Also
some breed societies don’t even allow Embryo transfer. I’ll state here quite
plainly that I support that view. I’m not a fan of either AI or ET, for native
animals. I think normal matings and normal births are essential risks to test
the toughness of the breeds. If we interfere too much in normal systems, we may
perpetuate a weakness that would compromise the survival of our animals if we
stopped looking after them. Thankfully none of our British rare natives are so
rare that such drastic measures are our only option. Here’s
an example. How many of you eat turkey at Thanksgiving? Most of you I expect.
Did you know that the broad breasted turkey can’t reproduce any more without
human help? The birds are so heavily built now through constant selection for
weight and size and breast muscle that the jocks can’t do their job naturally
any more. The next generation HAS to be produced by AI. OK, there are lots of
them (on turkey farms) but if tastes were to change – say everyone turned
vegetarian and the turkeys were chucked out into the wild – the broad breasted
strain would just vanish. We don’t want to be responsible for turning any of
our native breeds into a “turkey.” Positive signposts: Train and have fun!One of the great assets to any breed is a large number of single-pony or single-horse owners who simply take their animals to have fun in public. Surplus stock can go on to be useful pets or performers in active but “non-breeding” homes. A gelding or a geld mare can then be as great an ambassador for the breed as a breeding mare or stallion though their genetic input is nil. For
heaven’s sake, train them, use them, ride them, drive them; if you need to,
plough with them; and go out and have fun with your native ponies! A British
native pony should be an easy care option, a “non iron drip dry” ride. Educate
– and Go Easy on the fantasy
I’ll
say it again! Train him and go out and use him and show your potential owners
that they can have fun too. Honest education and promotionThat’s
what I mean by honest education and promotion of a breed. Yes, promotion by
enthusiasts is important. But it must be done with care. It is misleading –
for instance – to promote a breed by association with another; deliberately to
compare Fell or Dales ponies to Friesians, Haflingers to Belgians, or Morgans to
Saddlebreds. It may be good for sales to attract the attention of people … but
then perhaps they should actually looking for an entirely different breed.
Don’t sell out the integrity and future of your breed type riding another
breed’s coattails. Be honest, and avoid hype. That
depends upon their credentials. Are
they versed in their breed? An
expert in their own right? If not,
their fame is not likely to bring our breed staunch new support – only
groupies – the “I want one because ‘they’ have one” crowd... I would
rather see someone buy and use a pony because they like the qualities of that
pony than because the Queen of England happens to own one. The cachet of famous
ownership may work in advertising marmalade, but I am not convinced it is a
valid reason for ownership of a live animal. The wider viewOne has to be realistic, which is why
I’ve outlined the differing goals of breeders. “Production Breeders” for
profit are not going to see eye to eye with conservationists, or even the
backyard/hobby breeders. The aims of the “improvers” may not be the same as
any of them. Some “Production Breeders” will not care about recognising
British breed type, or excellence of conformation, or varied genetic makeup, or
the invisible inside of the pony that makes it a typical British Native. Is
there a central body responsible overall? Can
it guide and unify breed supporters and represent them? In such a large country
it is inevitable that there will be break-ups within groups who claim to support
any given breed. It’s partly due to geographical distance, partly to personal
preferences. The Experts …The mother country’s own breed societyIt
seems to me that the first resource has GOT to be the mother country’s own
breed society. Where else can you tap into the collective knowledge of the
breed? The mother breed society will
have numerous mentor breeders. Take
advantage of them! Be
prepared to sit humbly in the student chair and learn. A new breeder has not
earned the right to chime in with preconceptions about their chosen breed. Going
it alone will not help your rare breed. Receiving
mentoring doesn’t have to be painful! It can be a useful two-way exchange of
ideas. Sometimes the questions from the newcomer illuminate concepts that the
mother society has not even considered. But it may get uncomfortable if the
newcomer tries to impose the standards of his own uninformed perception, or
behaves in ways that force the breed to adopt activities or courses of action
that are currently frowned upon. As
a new breeder you’ve got to remain open to advice or instruction from the
mother society. Splits in the support mechanisms and networks for a horse breed
occur far too frequently. They’re often unintentional – perhaps even
accidental – and they can go on forever because of hurt pride, stubborn
personal opinions, or more often what Somerville and Ross 2 described
as “obstinate greed and infinite leisure”. But as ALBC is quick to point
out, splits between breeders and their mother society are very detrimental to
the future health of a breed overseas: Marjorie
Bender of ALBC has written that: “Imported
populations to North America are particularly subject to conservation problems.
They have a history of becoming orphaned from their primary populations.
The result – conservation is undermined as important breeding stock is
"lost" from the global population. It has, therefore, become
increasingly clear to ALBC that for imported breeds reciprocity with the mother
registry is critical.” Slow down – be patientSomething
I also think I ought to say here as a Brit to the American horse breeder is, “Slow
down – be patient. Take the longer view.”
ALBC
recommends breeding strategies that will preserve genetic diversity.
My ALBC copy of Sponenberg and Christman’s “A
Conservation Breeding Handbook”
is falling apart from use, and I don’t even breed………. So I do know that
ALBC can and will advise on breeding strategies for conservation. BUT it cannot
possibly legislate for the politics and the internal stresses generated by
groups of competing owners with differing aims. Get
people together in the same place, at events where everyone is assumed to have
the best interests of their breed at heart! Bigger or smaller events, it
doesn’t matter. The glitz is not the breed. The horses and ponies and the
owners are the breed. Breeder’s
co-operatives
I
believe that the future development of British breeds in America is vitally
dependent on
a co-operative network of breeders for your specific breed.
Get to know the bloodlines of your fellow breeders’ stock. Share your
resources on a planned, agreed schedule. Actual
breeding strategies for conservation can be read up from the ALBC handbook;
therefore elaboration is not necessary here. There are far more knowledgeable
people who write from their own experience whereas I can’t.
“Breeders”
= those who keep young stock replacements Your
fillies are the mainstay of your herd and its type. It’s your mares who
represent your breed, not your stallions... mares make a far greater
contribution than is often acknowledged. Maintenance and support of a breed
cannot include selling all your foals year after year. The maintenance pattern
certainly excludes advertising foals for sale from before their conception. The
road forward that I would choose is sign posted like this: I would urge all stewards of rare breed livestock to learn as much as they can from their mother breed society. Learn and act in accordance with the rules of the breed society and take the advice of its experienced breeders. Conservation organisations such as ALBC, and
their British counterpart RBST, and the Equus Survival Trust have, quite
literally, a vital role to play in helping breeds to survive. An appreciation of
their advice is important. The
Conservation Organizations’ roles: * they share information about breeds with the inquiring public. * they direct the inquiring public to identified breed contacts. * they help breeders understand breeding for conservation * they conserve the genetic diversity and integrity of the breed. * they promote their breed honestly to the public. * they hold their breeders to a high level of ethical conduct to protect their breed’s reputation and they enhance the potential for constructive conservation of the breed. To
be a breeder of a rare breed is both a great responsibility and a great reward You,
who are Breeders of British Native horses and ponies, have quite a task in front
of you. ¨
You MUST conserve your
breed type – whatever makes your breed true to itself and distinct from other
horses or ponies ¨
You MUST conserve healthy
genetic diversity within your breed type ¨
You MUST conserve your
breed’s “excellence at doing its work” – a sound body and a sound mind The
three “Shoulds” are these: ¨
You SHOULD enjoy your
ownership and share your enjoyment with other people. ¨
You SHOULD be proud of
your choice of breed and humble in your stewardship. ¨
You SHOULD use and
promote your rare horses and ponies as honestly as you can. Now,
just one “Could” – but it’s a big one……….. ¨
You could nurture your
breed’s diversity, so well, that the American gene pool could be a potential
breeding resource for Britain. ¨
Love your horses as
though you were going to die tomorrow. Breed them as though you were going to
live forever. And good luck! 1
Clive Richardson, a talk at the Kentucky Horse Park, USA, British
Rare Breeds on Parade, June 2003 Editor’s Notes: Sue
Millard became involved with Fell ponies over 30 years ago when working with
a trekking string in the North of the Lake District. Formerly a harness maker,
Sue is now a lecturer in Multimedia Computing at the University of Central
Lancashire. She has been a member of the Fell Pony Society for 20 years, judges
Fells & carriage driving, is a Council member and chairs the Overseas Sub
Committee of the FPS. Sue is also the webmaster and researcher of the on-line Fell Pony Museum, a very in-depth, educational, and yet entertaining site which can be viewed at www.fellpony.f9.co.uk. She lives in the beautiful Lake District of England with her Fell pony, one very able and active sheep dog, and her (long- suffering) husband. The “Equus Survival Trust” can be reached at 0844 Highway 172, West Liberty, Kentucky 41472 USA, www.Equus-Survival-Trust.org “British Rare Breeds on Parade” – more information on this past conservational/educational event can be found at www.Fellpony.org The
American Livestock Breeds Conservancy can be reached at P.O. Box 477,
Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312 USA, Telephone:
(919) 542-5704, Fax: (919)
545-0022, www.albc-usa.org
|